The Palace, installation view Muzeum Sztuki, Łódź, 2021, photo: HaWa

Exhibition Projects

The Palace

2021, Muzeum Sztuki, Łódź

Staged as a theatrical environment populated by political gifts and their afterlives, the exhibition explored how culture becomes a performative tool through which political elites define what is representable in the name of the nation and the common good.

The Palace, installation view Muzeum Sztuki, Łódź, 2021, photo: HaWa

For this exhibition, Jasmina Cibic transformed the former palace of industrialist Maurycy Poznański into a reflection on solidarity, political desire, and the instrumentalisation of culture in times of crisis. Through film, photography, sculpture, and sound, the exhibition examined how art and architecture have been mobilised to forge collective identities, project political ideals, and negotiate social divisions.

What do the Palais des Nations in Geneva, the Palace of Culture and Science in Warsaw, and the former residence of a textile magnate in Łódź have in common? Who has the authority to reunite a divided society: the architect, the politician, or the artist? How is a national aesthetic constructed, and what political ambitions are embedded within the act of giving? These questions formed the starting point of Cibic’s investigation into culture as a vehicle of soft power.

At the centre of the exhibition was The Gift, a film that explored the notion of culture as a political gift capable of healing a fractured nation. Through allegory and performance, the film presented three finalists competing to offer the ideal gift to a divided society: an Engineer, a Diplomat, and an Artist. Each proposed a different vision of how culture might restore communication and cohesion between opposing groups.

The film was shot within a series of buildings that themselves embody acts of political gifting: Oscar Niemeyer’s French Communist Party Headquarters in Paris, donated by the architect to the Party; the Palais des Nations in Geneva, assembled through contributions from member states of the League of Nations; and Warsaw’s Palace of Culture and Science, presented by the Soviet Union to the Republic of Poland. These sites were conceived as monuments to education, diplomacy, culture, and international cooperation, yet they also reveal how architecture can operate as an instrument of political influence and ideological projection.

For Cibic, these buildings are more than historical backdrops. They stand as material traces of successive attempts to construct transnational alliances through culture, from the interwar period and post-war reconstruction to the ideological struggles of the late twentieth century. The exhibition examined how such gestures sought to foster solidarity while simultaneously advancing particular political interests, revealing culture’s dual role as a tool of cohesion and persuasion.

Extending beyond the film, the exhibition assembled a constellation of political gifts and symbolic objects that testified to faith in collective ideals. These included photographic portraits of roses bred and named after politicians associated with anti-fascist and European projects, relay batons presented to the president of former Yugoslavia as symbols of unity among its republics, and a photographic portrait of the International Collection of Modern Art—an extraordinary gift donated by European artists in response to the appeal of the avant-garde “a.r.” group and entrusted to the care of Muzeum Sztuki in Łódź.

Alongside these examples of generosity and transnational solidarity, the exhibition also considered the failures of cultural diplomacy. One such case was the unrealised flag of the League of Nations. Despite receiving numerous proposals from artists and designers, no official design was ever adopted, out of concern that privileging one emblem over another might undermine the organisation’s cohesion. For Cibic, such failed attempts at symbolic unification are as revealing as the successful ones. They expose the limits of soft power and invite reflection on culture’s capacity to resist complete appropriation by political authority.

Bringing together architecture, film, archival material, and symbolic objects, the exhibition traced the afterlives of political gifts and the ambitions they carried. It asked what remains of the ideals invested in them, and whether culture might still offer a space for imagining forms of solidarity beyond the structures of power that seek to instrumentalise it.

Works

The Gift 2021 Film & Video

Three-channel UHD video, stereo, 25 min

The Pleasure of Exchange 2020 Performance

Performative installation
Embroidered hammocks, steel, wood

Dimensions variable

Revolutionary Artists 2021 Photography

C-type print

100 cm × 80 cm

Youth Relay 2020 Photography

C-type print

100 cm × 80 cm

Founding Fathers 2020 Photography

C-type print

100 cm × 80 cm

Exhibition

Publications

Matthieu Lelievre The archive as strategy and method 2023

In his essay The Archive as Strategy and Method in Jasmina Cibic’s Work, Matthieu Lelièvre examines how Cibic uses the archive as an active tool for questioning set grand narratives of political and national power.

Lelièvre describes Cibic’s practice as one that identifies highly specific historical “traces” and re-stages them within new scenographic contexts, also chosen with precision to allow for alternative world building thinking processes to emerge. Through this, she interrogates the reliability of sources and the mechanisms through which history is written, transmitted, and legitimised. Her work draws on extensive research and collaboration, assembling archives, architectural forms, performances, and texts into a total work that obsessively studies the relationship between art and political and national power.

The essay highlights how Cibic focuses not only on cultural objects but on the systems that produce and circulate them—such as political commissions, institutional frameworks, and cultural diplomacy. By reactivating moments such as performances, exhibitions, and architectural projects (including those linked to Cold War contexts and international exhibitions), she reveals how art always operates within state apparatuses and contributes to shaping collective identity.

Lelièvre also emphasises Cibic’s interest in the gaps and omissions within archives—the missing, edited, or suppressed elements—as sites of critical potential. By working with these absences, she creates speculative narratives that blur the boundaries between fact and fiction, documentary and construction.

The essay presents Cibic’s engagement with the archive as an ongoing method: a way of analysing dominant narratives and exposing the ideological forces that sustain them, while opening space for alternative readings of history and its contemporary urgencies.

Tevž Logar Bread and Roses 2022

Written in the context of Jasmina Cibic’s solo exhibition at Museum der Moderne Salzburg, the conversation between Tevž Logar and Jasmina Cibic, centres on the conditions of cultural production in a shifting geopolitical landscape shaped by Brexit, the pandemic, and the rise of right-wing populism. Framed around Cibic’s exhibition Most Favoured Nation, the dialogue reflects on how contemporary art navigates systems of power, censorship, and institutional control.

Cibic describes how recent political and social transformations have reconfigured exhibition-making, limiting access to archives, altering institutional priorities, and reinforcing national frameworks of cultural presentation. These shifts, she argues, threaten decades of transnational cultural exchange while intensifying pressures toward simplification, self-censorship, and alignment with political and funding agendas.

Looking forward, Cibic positions her practice as an ongoing investigation into systems of control—national and supranational—through film, performance, and research-based methodologies. Her work seeks to map the evolving “power verticals” that shape cultural capital, while maintaining a commitment to complexity, critical thought, and the possibility of agency within cultural production.