The Pleasure of Exchange

Performance

The Pleasure of Exchange

2020

A performative installation for female voices and suspended sculptural forms, The Pleasure of Exchange reclaims political rhetoric historically authored by patriarchal systems and reimagines it as a collective act of resistance and solidarity.

The Pleasure of Exchange

The Pleasure of Exchange is a performative installation developed within Jasmina Cibic’s broader research project and film The Gift, which examines the relationship between political spectacle, the gifting of culture, and the historical exclusion of women from the symbolic construction of twentieth-century ideological projects. The title alludes to anthropologist Marcel Mauss’s writings on gift exchange and the social obligations embedded within acts of giving, while “the pleasure of expense” references the ceremonial excess through which power, prestige, and ideological alliances are publicly staged. Combining sculptural installation, live vocal performance, and sound, the work transforms the exhibition space into a ceremonial environment in which diplomacy, architecture, and the female body become entangled within the performative language of state power.

At the centre of the installation are suspended metal structures supporting embroidered fabric hammocks inscribed with political slogans drawn from speeches, declarations, and cultural policies associated with moments of geopolitical transformation and crisis. Reclining within these suspended forms, an all-female vocal ensemble performs a composition developed in collaboration with composer and vocalist Barbara Kinga Majewska. The libretto assembles fragments of archival political rhetoric surrounding culture, solidarity, and international cooperation—texts historically authored, institutionalised, and circulated within overwhelmingly patriarchal political systems.

The composition is built around fragments of Allgemeiner Völkerversöhnungs-Marsch op. 11 by Franz Brabes, a musical score donated to the League of Nations and discovered by Cibic during research at the United Nations Library & Archives Geneva. Reanimated through the female voice, the archival material is transformed from a historical gesture of diplomatic idealism into a speculative choral response to the ideological uses of art and culture throughout the twentieth century.

Suspended between rest, ritual, and display, the performers inhabit the installation as both subjects and scenographic elements, exposing the proximity between the instrumentalisation of culture and the instrumentalisation of the female body within political representation. The hammocks—objects associated with leisure, retreat, and vulnerability—become temporary stages for a collective voice historically excluded from the authorship of nation-building and international diplomacy.

Through its fusion of operatic spectacle, political rhetoric, and sculptural choreography, The Pleasure of Exchange reflects on the role of art and architecture as tools through which states imagine solidarity, negotiate ideological identity, and aestheticise political power. Simultaneously, the work proposes the female voice as a site through which these inherited narratives may be re-performed, interrupted, and collectively rewritten.

Publication

Maja and Reuben Fowkes Soft power and socialist modernity in the films of Jasmina Cibic 2022

This essay by Maja and Reuben Fowkes examines Jasmina Cibic’s film practice as a critical exploration of cultural diplomacy and the ideological role of art and architecture in shaping political identities. Focusing on works such as Fruits of Our Land, The Pavilion, the Nada trilogy, and The Gift, the authors show how Cibic constructs scripted debates performed by archetypal figures within historically charged architectural settings—to reveal how culture has been instrumentalised in moments of political crisis and international representation.

The text highlights how Cibic reactivates overlooked histories of modernism and re-stages past cultural conflicts to expose recurring tensions between artistic autonomy and state agendas, particularly around how nations present themselves on the global stage. Across her films, architecture becomes an active agent, while dialogue—assembled from historical speeches and cultural discourse—unfolds as a performative negotiation of ideology, memory, and power. The essay ultimately positions Cibic’s work as a form of critical “Trojan horse,” reintroducing the emancipatory, transnational, and feminist potentials of socialist modernity as an alternative to contemporary capitalist and nationalist frameworks.