In Rhythmic Affinity

Performance

In Rhythmic Affinity (Most Favoured Nation)

2022

Combining fragments of wartime musical idealism with speeches on diplomacy and trade, In Rhythmic Affinity stages the female voice as both witness to and absence within the political theatre of the twentieth century.

In Rhythmic Affinity

In Rhythmic Affinity was originally conceived for Jasmina Cibic’s solo exhibition at the Museum der Moderne Salzburg, where three female singers occupied a series of suspended hammocks during the exhibition opening, performing a live vocal composition that later remained in the space as a sound installation. Developed in collaboration with composer and vocalist Barbara Kinga Majewska, the work examines the role of culture, music, and diplomacy in the construction of political imaginaries and international consensus.

The composition draws on fragments of Allgemeiner Völkerversöhnungs-Marsch op. 11 by Franz Brabes, a musical score Cibic discovered while researching in the archives of the United Nations Library & Archives Geneva, housed within the Palace of Nations—the former headquarters of the League of Nations. Submitted during the Second World War as a symbolic gift and gesture of hope while the palace itself stood closed, Brabes’s composition became the starting point for a contemporary reworking of political idealism through sound.

For the performance, Cibic assembled a libretto from fragments of political speeches, diplomatic declarations, and World Trade Organization agreements structured around the “most-favored-nation” principle. Among the texts quoted is a 1957 speech by German diplomat Albrecht von Kessel delivered at the opening of German Art of the 20th Century at the Museum of Modern Art, in which art is proposed as a mediator capable of succeeding where diplomacy, politics, and economics might fail.

Positioned between lullaby, political anthem, and elegy, In Rhythmic Affinity reflects on the instrumentalisation of culture as a form of soft power and diplomatic choreography. Following the live activation, the absent voices of the performers remained as a disembodied sonic presence throughout the exhibition, transforming the installation into an acoustic space haunted by those excluded from political authorship. Through this deliberate absence, the work foregrounds the historical erasure of women from the major political negotiations and ideological constructions of the twentieth century, while simultaneously reclaiming the female voice as a carrier of collective memory and speculative futures.

Credits

In collaboration with Barbara Kinga Majewska

Publications

Jasmina Cibic A Flag, a Song, a Palace 2023

Art and Self-Determination: A Reader includes essays, poems and artistic responses to the theme of self-determination arising from a three-year research project funded by the Decade of Centenaries Programme. Taking as its starting point the centenary of the formation of the Irish Free State and the international movement towards self-determination post-World War One, this project focused on the role of art and artists against the backdrop of the changing map of Europe. Over three years, this project encompassed an international research conference, a summer school and reading group, a podcast IMMA Past Futures, artist commissions and a major exhibition, Self-Determination: A Global Perspective, October 2023–April 2024. Contributors to this publication – among them artists, scholars, researchers, historians, poets, activists and writers – were invited to reflect on the theme of self-determination from a range of perspectives across time and space.

In her essay titled A Flag, a Song, a Palace: Exploring the Scenography of Euorpes’s First Foray into Transnationalism, Jasmina Cibic reflects on the ways culture is deployed within moments of political transition, focusing on early experiments in transnational identity formation in Europe. Using the League of Nations as a key example, she traces how architecture, artistic commissions, and exhibition formats were mobilised to articulate and negotiate new political frameworks.

Rather than neutral expressions, these cultural forms are revealed as strategic tools—vehicles through which ideological positions are staged and communicated. From architectural proposals to symbolic and performative elements, aesthetic choices become central to the construction of collective narratives, while simultaneously exposing frictions between national interests and transnational aspirations.

Cibic’s essay maps recurring patterns in the use of culture as a method patriarchal verticals use throughout history, positioning artistic production as both embedded within and capable of critically unpacking these processes of political world-making.