Ideologies of Display (Athene noctua)

Photography

Ideologies of Display

2008

Visibility as control: how modernity staged animals and trained the gaze.

Ideologies of Display (Athene noctua)

Ideologies of Display is a series of large-scale photographs depicting architectural installations meticulously constructed by the artist within the controlled space of her studio. These environments are not autonomous inventions but careful reconstructions, shaped through the specific tactics and methods developed by the modernist architect Berthold Lubetkin and his collective Tecton—key figures in the architectural transformations of 1930s Britain. Together, they authored some of the earliest modernist panopticon-like display systems: the zoological pavilions of Dudley Zoo and London Zoo. These were architectures of total visibility, in which the exhibited animal could, for the first time, be seen at all times and from any position occupied by the spectator.

In returning to Lubetkin’s work, Cibic does not merely cite a historical precedent but activates it as a critical framework through which to examine the exhibition space as an architectonic apparatus. What emerges is an inquiry into the ideological structures embedded beneath its surfaces—structures that determine not only how something is shown, but how it is understood, valued and received. The installations restage the logic of display as both a spatial and political condition, exposing the mechanisms that organise perception and regulate visibility.

Within these constructed settings, the presence of animals—confined, positioned, and rendered perpetually visible—recalls and destabilises the display strategies of 1930s zoological exhibits. These were governed by strict spatial rules designed to eliminate the possibility of concealment, ensuring that the animal remained continuously available to the spectator’s gaze. In Cibic’s work, this enforced visibility is both reproduced and undone: the animal becomes a figure through which the violence and precision of such systems are made legible.

The series extends architecture beyond its conventional role as a neutral container for display, transforming it into the object of display itself. The structures no longer simply frame what is seen; they become what is seen. In doing so, the work shifts attention from the exhibited subject to the conditions of its presentation, amplifying what was intended to remain invisible. What comes into focus is the underlying ideology of display itself—the constructed nature of looking, and the systems of power that govern what is made visible, and how.

Publications

Petja Grafenauer The beauty of ideology 2013
Simona Vidmar Spectators, Tourists and Casual Passers-by, Oris no. 58, Zagreb 2009

This essay examines Jasmina Cibic’s early artistic practice through a series of performative interventions and staged environments realised in spaces such as airports, tourist sites, zoos, and exhibition architectures. Focusing on projects including Everybody for Safari (2005), Dictionary of Imaginary Places, Tourists Welcome, and Ideologies of Display, the text traces the emergence of Cibic’s long-standing interest in spectatorship, tourism, systems of display, and the ideological choreography of public space.

The essay positions Cibic’s early works as investigations into how environments associated with travel, consumption, and leisure construct desire and collective imagination. By inserting fictional destinations into airport information systems, staging performances within airport terminals, or transforming exhibition spaces into scenographic constructions, Cibic exposes the mechanisms through which spectacle, aspiration, and authority are aestheticised and normalised.

Particular emphasis is placed on the artist’s use of highly controlled visual languages borrowed from advertising, tourism, and late capitalism. Rather than critiquing these systems from a distance, Cibic reenacts and subtly destabilises them through fictional interventions, performative gestures, and staged “souvenirs” of experience.

The essay identifies these early projects as foundational to Cibic’s later practice, establishing methodologies that continue throughout her work: the use of architecture, scenography, performance, and historical reference to interrogate how political, cultural, and ideological identities are constructed and performed.