Anophthalmus hitleri, mixed media on paper, installation view Situation Anophthalmus hitleri, European Capital of Culture Maribor, 2012

Exhibition Projects

Situation Anophthalmus hitleri

2012, European Capital of Culture Maribor

An immersive investigation into how nations construct themselves.

Anophthalmus hitleri, mixed media on paper, installation view Situation Anophthalmus hitleri, European Capital of Culture Maribor, 2012

Situation Anophthalmus hitleri investigates the mechanisms through which nations construct, stage, and perpetuate their symbolic identities. Developed in the context of Maribor's designation as European Capital of Culture, the project begins with a contradiction at the heart of contemporary cultural diplomacy: while such initiatives claim to foster transnational exchange and European solidarity, they often intensify national competition, prompting states and cities to manufacture new cultural icons capable of representing them on an international stage. Rather than questioning this logic from the outside, Cibic turns her attention to the mechanisms through which representation itself is produced.

Conceived as a Gesamtkunstwerk, the exhibition combines film, sculpture, architectural reconstruction, scientific illustration, and delegated production. Architects, scientists, craftsmen, factories, and illustrators each contribute to a system in which authorship becomes distributed, echoing the institutional processes through which nations themselves construct cultural identity.

The exhibition transformed the gallery into a cave-like environment, drawing on the cave as both a physical site and a metaphorical space where ideologies sediment over time. Like geological strata, political narratives accumulate, becoming embedded so deeply within cultural memory that they appear natural and immutable. The cave also evokes Plato's allegory: a space where perception is mediated through carefully staged images rather than direct experience. Throughout the installation, visitors encounter architectures of display that reveal how national myths are less discovered than projected.

At the centre of the exhibition, Framing the Space presents a dialogue between a journalist and the architect responsible for the successive redesigns of Vila Bled, the former summer residence of Josip Broz Tito. Continuously adapted to accommodate changing political elites, the building becomes a case study in how architecture serves power while simultaneously rewriting its own history. Drawing upon the architect's personal archive, the film reflects on the uneasy relationship between architecture, political authority, and the construction of national spectacle.

Elsewhere, crystal reconstructions of unrealised exhibition pavilions designed by the Slovene modernist architect Vinko Glanz recall proposals for Slovenia's first coherent national trade fair, cancelled with the outbreak of the Second World War. Produced in collaboration with Steklarna Rogaška—a factory whose crystal has supplied diplomatic gifts and state protocol across successive political systems—the sculptures expose how objects of national representation often survive the ideologies that commissioned them.

Encased within these crystalline architectures is Anophthalmus hitleri, a blind cave beetle endemic to Slovenia. Discovered in 1933 and named in 1937 by an admirer of Adolf Hitler, the insect remains permanently marked by an ideological moment that scientific nomenclature cannot erase. Hidden within fractured crystal vitrines, the beetle becomes both specimen and political witness: a living reminder that history often persists through seemingly neutral systems of classification.

The project culminates in an encyclopaedic display of drawings and paintings of the beetle produced by more than forty internationally recognised entomologists and scientific illustrators. Working only from the Latin name and their disciplinary expertise—without access to the actual specimen—they unknowingly projected the ideological associations embedded within scientific language itself. Their images expose how acts of representation are never innocent, but continually shaped by inherited systems of knowledge, authority, and imagination.

Through architecture, natural history, scientific illustration, and exhibition design, Situation Anophthalmus hitleri reveals display itself as a political technology. Rather than asking how nations choose their symbols, the project asks how symbols come to acquire authority in the first place—and how the deeply embedded patriarchal residues continue to naturalise ideological narratives long after the political systems that produced them have disappeared.

Works

Framing the Space 2012 Film & Video

perspex chandelier, installation view Situation Anophthalmus hitleri, European Capital of Culture Maribor, 2012

Situation Anophthalamus Hitler 2012 Works on Paper

Situation Anophthalmus hitleri, Installation view, European Capital of Culture Maribor, 2012

The Crystal Pavilions 2012 Installation & Sculpture

Crystal, soil, Anophthalmus hitleri beetles

Publications

Petja Grafenauer The beauty of ideology 2013
Suzana Milevska The political economy of the name and events of representation in Jasmina Cibic’s art 2012

Written in the context of Jasmina Cibic’s project For Our Economy and Culture at the 55th Venice Biennial, Suzana Milevska’s essay The Political Economy of the Name and Events of Representation in Jasmina Cibic’s Art examines the entanglement of naming, ideology, and national representation.

Milevska frames Cibic’s project as an investigation into the paradox of representing a nation, questioning whether any stable or “proper” criteria for such representation can exist. Drawing on archival material and historical debates, the work exposes the contradictions between national identity and international cultural positioning, revealing representation as a contested and unstable process.

Central to her analysis is the motif of naming, explored through Cibic’s use of the cave beetle Anophthalmus hitleri. This example foregrounds the political and ideological weight carried by names, demonstrating how systems of classification, identity, and value are embedded within broader social and historical frameworks. Milevska extends this logic to the artist’s role at the Biennial, suggesting a parallel between the named specimen and the artist positioned as a representative “sample” of a nation.

The essay places naming as both a symbolic contract and a site of power, shaped by competing systems of authority and interpretation. Drawing on philosophical and political theory, Milevska argues that acts of naming and renaming are never neutral but are bound to ideological structures that determine inclusion, exclusion, and legitimacy. In this sense, representation is inseparable from the politics of language and classification.

Milevska situates the central critical concern of Cibic’s project at the intersection of naming, value, and display, where representation operates as both a system of exchange and a cultural act. Rather than resolving its contradictions, the work sustains the unstable position between the artist as an individual subject and as a national signifier, foregrounding the conditions through which visibility is produced, assigned, and circulated.